[AstroNet] The Economist - SKA

[Case Rijsdijk]

May be of interest  - from the Economist

Kind regards

Case

Science in South Africa
All squared
A new radio telescope may catalyse African science

 The KAT is out of the bag
THE idea for the world's most powerful radio telescope, capable of seeing 
back nearly to the origins of the universe, has been around for some time. 
Known as the Square Kilometre Array, or SKA-as that was originally planned 
to be the total collecting area of its thousands of dish-shaped antennae-it 
was conceived of by an international group of astronomers in the early 
1990s. No construction has yet begun. Indeed, no site has yet been chosen. 
However, in the vast quietness of the Karoo, a semi-desert in South Africa, 
a small prototype is already operating and its first images are, by all 
accounts, remarkable.

The Karoo Array Telescope (KAT-7) consists of seven steerable dishes, each 
12 metres across. As such, it is already the most powerful array-based 
telescope in Africa. It is, though, merely a test bed for MeerKAT, a device 
that will consist of 64 somewhat larger dishes and will be the most powerful 
instrument in the southern hemisphere as well as one of the three most 
sensitive in the world.

Science
The SKA will dwarf these minnows. It will be 50-100 times more powerful than 
any predecessor, and will be able to peer back through time almost to the 
Big Bang itself, exploring the formation of the first stars and galaxies, 
the role of magnetism in the early cosmos, what exactly dark matter and dark 
energy are, the nature of gravity, whether intelligent life has ever existed 
anywhere other than on Earth, and the validity of such fundamental 
scientific concepts as Einstein's theory of relativity. The world's 
astronomers are, understandably, fizzing with excitement.

Astronomical sums

There is, though, the small matter of money. The SKA will cost a lot: ?1.5 
billion-2 billion ($2 billion-2.75 billion), according to the nine-country 
consortium behind the project; nearer $6 billion, according to America's 
National Science Foundation. On November 23rd those nine 
countries-Australia, Britain, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, the 
Netherlands, New Zealand and South Africa-and possibly China as well, are 
due to commit themselves to paying ?90m for the initial engineering-planning 
phase. But it will be when the megabuck work on the actual telescope begins 
in 2016, that the crunch comes.

This is where MeerKAT-named after a species of mongoose found in arid areas 
of south-western Africa such as the Karoo-could play a crucial role. The 
construction of its dishes is about to be put out to tender, and it is 
expected to be fully operational by 2016. If MeerKAT succeeds, it might help 
persuade sceptical governments to cough up for the SKA. It will also enhance 
South Africa's chances of hosting this much larger project.

Originally, America had been expected to participate. But it has now cried 
off, at least until 2020. The disappointment of this withdrawal, however, is 
mitigated by the keen interest being shown by China. The country with the 
world's second-biggest economy has never invested in a big global science 
project before.

China was one of the places originally considered as host for the telescope. 
But it and Argentina have since been dropped, leaving just South Africa and 
Australia in the race. They are said to be neck and neck. Both offer remote, 
sparsely populated areas with low levels of man-made radio interference, 
along with world-class teams of astronomers. Australia has more experience 
with radio astronomy, but South Africa has the advantage of lower costs and 
ease of access. As a developing country in which over a third of the 
population still live on less than $2 a day, it might also be considered to 
have the greater moral claim. And it has KAT-7, and will shortly have 
MeerKAT.

The victor will be announced in February by the board of the not-for-profit 
company that is to be formed by the participating countries when they 
formally sign up to start paying for the project. Regardless of who wins, 
some critics say South Africa's contribution would be better spent feeding 
and housing the country's poor. But if South Africa did succeed, that would 
mean part of everybody else's contribution would be spent there as well-a 
prize worth fighting for. Moreover, the government believes projects like 
this help inspire people and encourage young South Africans to consider 
scientific careers. Naledi Pandor, the science and technology minister, is 
particularly supportive. She sees the SKA as a way to broaden the country's 
scientific base and diversify its current white, male-dominated complexion.

The bid also involves eight of South Africa's neighbours-Botswana, Ghana, 
Kenya, Madagascar, Mauritius, Mozambique, Namibia and Zambia-and could be 
the launch pad for a wider scientific renaissance in Africa. Australia will 
not give up easily, and the outcome may be that the telescope is shared, 
with some of the antennae in one country and the rest in the other. But even 
that half loaf would be a useful boost for South African science, and a sign 
that the traditional powers of the subject are willing to share the goodies.